Robert of Farndale

 

c 1296 to c 1360

 

The First Family Tree

 

Robert was outlawed for hunting

 

FAR00012

 

Home Page

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

Return to the Home Page of the Farndale Family Website

The Farndale Story

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

The story of one family’s journey through two thousand years of British History

The Farndale Lineages

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

The 83 family lines into which the family is divided. Meet the whole family and how the wider family is related

The Farndale Directory

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

Members of the historical family ordered by date of birth

Themes

Links to other pages with historical research and related material

Related Family Stories

The story of the Bakers of Highfields, the Chapmans, and other related families

 

 

Dates are in red.

Hyperlinks to other pages are in dark blue.

Headlines are in brown.

References and citations are in turquoise.

Context and local history are in purple.

 

 

1296

 

If Robert was aged about 34 when he was outlawed in 1330, he might have been born in about 1296. He was probably the brother of Roger Milne de Farndale (FAR00013A) and we know that he was the son of Peter de Farndale (FAR00008).

1330

 

In 1330, Richard Mosyn, of that part of Rossedale which belongs to the Abbot of S. Mary's (i.e. Rosedale West), William Troten of Spaunton, Roger del Mulne of Farndale, Robert son of Peter of Rossedale, Walter Blackhous of Farndale, went on a Monday in January to some unknown place within the forest and killed a soar and slew a hart with bows and arrows. All are outlawed. If we are right about his age, he was about sixty five by then.

A hart is a male deer and a soar is a sow or pig.

1334

 

In 1334 Roger del Mulne of Farndale, together with Robert, son of Peter of Farndale, Walter Blakhous of Farndale, and Ralph de Heued of Farndale on Monday after the feast of the Epiphany, came in the forest in an unknown place with bows and arrows and killed one four year old buck and hunted one stag and carried away with them the game and thereupon did their will.

Pleas of the forest of Henry, earl of Lancaster, of Pikeryng [Pickering], held at Pickering before Richard de Wylughby [Willoughby], Robert de Hungerford and John de Hambury, justices itinerant on this occasion assigned to take pleas of the said forest in Yorkshire: … Richard Moryn of Rossedale [Rosedale] on the behalf of the abbot of St Mary, William Trotan of Spaunton, Roger del Mulne of Farndale, Robert, son of Peter of the same, Walter Blakhous of the same, and Ralph de Heued of the same: On Monday next after the feast of the Epiphany, they came in the forest in an unknown place with bows and arrows and killed one four-year-old buck and hunted one stag and carried away with them the game and thereupon did their will. They have not now come, etc. Therefore the sheriff is ordered to cause them to come … Roger son of Emma, John de Bordesden, Robert Moryng, John, son of William the Smith of Farndale, Robert Stybbyng, and William Bullok: Around the feast of St Botolph 10 Edw [III], they came in the forest in a place called Rotemir [Rutmoor], and took there one deer and one calf, and carried away that game …. Roger Sturdy, Thomas de Hippeswell, Robert, son of Simon de Farndale, John le Caluehird and Peter son of Henry: On Thursday next before Michaelmas 6 Edw III, they came in the said forest in a place called Flaskes and there hunted one stag and took it away with them. They have not now come, nor were they previosuly attached, but it is witnessed that they are living in the country. Therefore the sheriff is ordered to make them come … Richard, son of John the miller of Farndale, and Adam, son of Simon the miller of Farndale: After they trespassed about hunting in this forest, Richard and Adam were sent away by the mainprise of Nicholas de Repynghale [Rippingale], Adam, son of Nicholas de Farndale, Nicholas Laverok, John, son of John the miller, Nicholas de Brakenthwayt [Brackenthwaite[, Alan de Wraghby [Wragby] and John Wraghby of Farndale, who mainperned to have them on the first day of the eyre, and they so not now have them, etc … John, son of Richard de Westgille of Farndale: John was sent away by the mainprise of William le Smyth of Farndale, Richard de Westgill, John le Shephird of Farndale, John Alberd of the same, Nicholas, son of Walter of the same, John del Heued of the same, and Robert de Westgill, who mainperned to have him on the first day of the eyre, and they do not now have him, etc. Robert, son of Richard de Westgill of Farndale: Robert was sent away by the mainprise of William le Smyth of Farndale, John, son of Walter of the same, John Alberd of the same, and Nicholas, son of Walter of the same, who mainperned to have him on the first day of the eyre, and they do not now have him, etc … John son of Abba: John was sent away by the mainprise of Roger, son of Alfred de Farndale, Roger, son of Gilbert of the same, Richard de Beverle [Beverley] of the same, William Kyng of the same, John de Hoton of the same, Thomas Makand, Hugh the clerk of Cropton, William de Birkheued of Hartoft, Henry del Tung, Peter son of Gervase, Hugh Broun [Brown], smith, and William Hare, who mainperned to have him on the first day of the eyre, and they do not now have him, etc.

1335

 

It appears they evaded justice since at a hearing at Pickering on Monday 13 Mar 1335 before Richard de Willoughby and John de Hambury, the Sheriff was ordered to summon those named to appear this day before the Justices to satisfy the Earl for their fines for poaching in the forest of which they were convicted before the Justices by the evidence of the foresters, venderers and other officers. They did not appear and the Sheriff stated that they could not be found and are not in his bailiwick and he had no way of attacking them. He was therefore ordered to seize them and keep them safely so that he could produce them before the Justices on Monday 15 March 1335. A long list of names follows including Robert filium Simonis de Farndale, Rogerum de milne de Farndale, Robertum, filium Petri de Farndale.

Another record of 1335, on the Pleas of the forest of Henry, earl of Lancaster, of Pikeryng, held at Pickering before the Richard de Wylughby and John de Hambury, justices itinerant on this occasion assigned to take pleas of the said forest in Yorkshire also indicates their evasion of justice. A very long list of names included Robert, son of Simon de Farnedale, Roger del Milne of Farnedale, Robert, son of Peter de Farndale, Walter Blachose, regarding whom the sheriff was ordered to cause the aforesaid people to come before the justices here on this day to make satisfaction to the earl about their redemption for trespasses of hunting made in this forest, whereof they are convicted before the said justices by the foresters, verderers and other ministers. And they have not come.

 

1337

 

In 1337 on Pleas of the forest of Henry, earl of Lancaster, of Pikeryng, held at Pickering before the said Richard de Wylughby [Willoughby] and John de Hambury, justices itinerant on this occasion assigned to take pleas of the said forest in Yorkshire another long list of names was presented including Robert, son of Simon de Farnedale, Roger del Milne of Farnedale, Robert, son of Peter de Farndale, Walter Blachose, Ralph del Heued, and William de Ergom [Argam], chaplain, regarding whom the sheriff is ordered to cause the aforesaid people to come before the justices here on this day to make satisfaction to the earl about their redemption for trespasses of hunting made in this forest, whereof they are convicted before the said justices by the foresters, verderers and other ministers. And they have not come. This might have been their continued evasion of justice, or perhaps this followed a further poaching offence.

1338

 

In 1338 on the Pleas of the forest of Henry, earl of Lancaster, of Pikeryng, held at Pickering before the said Richard de Wylughby and John de Hambury, justices itinerant on this occasion assigned to take pleas of the said forest in Yorkshire, another long list of names included Robert, son of Simon de Farnedale, Roger del Milne of Farnedale, Robert, son of Peter de Farndale, Walter Blachose, Ralph del Heued, and William de Ergom (Argam), chaplain, regarding whom once again the sheriff is ordered to cause the aforesaid people to be exacted from county to county, until, etc, they are outlawed, if they do appear. And if they do appear, he is then to take them, in such a way that he has their bodies here at this day to make satisfaction to the earl about their redemption for trespasses of hunting whereof they are convicted before the said justices by the foresters, verderers and other ministers. This suggests an order to locate the gang who had perhaps by then been escaping evasion for several years.

Clearly efforts were made to apprehend Robert, son of Simon of Farndale, Roger the miller of Farndale, Robert son of Peter of Farndale, Walter Blackhaus, Ralph Heved and apparently even the chaplain in 1335 and 1337 and in 1338 they were outlawed with orders that they be apprehended and brought before the forest officers if found.

1360

 

He might have died in about 1360.