Details of people who held land directly from the Crown

 

Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Home Page

The Farndale Directory

Farndale Themes

Farndale History

Particular branches of the family tree

Other Information

General Sir Martin Farndale KCB

Links

 

Inquisitions post mortem were local enquiries into the lands held by a deceased individual, in order to discover any income and rights due to the crown. Such inquisitions were only held when people were thought or known to have held lands of the crown.

They are generally organised into Calendars of Inquisitions Post Mortem.

They can be found at the National Archives covering the periods 1236-1447 and 1485-1509. (Volumes for the period 1418-1447 are not available here but may be viewed at Mapping the Medieval Countryside. Inquistions for the years 1447-85 are currently unpublished.) See also online records of Calendars of Inquisitions (Chancery) at Medieval Genealogy.

Inquisitions post mortem (sometimes known as escheats) are among the most 'genealogist-friendly' of records, and were a mainstay of traditional medieval genealogy. These were inquiries, undertaken after the death of a feudal tenant in chief (that is, a direct tenant of the crown), to establish what lands were held and who should succeed to them. They survive from around 1240 until the Restoration in 1660, when feudal tenure was abolished.

After the death of a tenant in chief, a writ (of 'diem clausit extremum') would usually be issued to the local escheator, the official responsible for taking possession of the dead tenant's estate. He would then convene a local jury and conduct an inquiry - usually a separate one was held in each of the counties where the deceased had held land. The earliest inquisitions are less detailed, but generally the information recorded would include the date when the tenant died, the names of the manors held and details of the services performed in return for them, and also the name, age and relationship of the heir (or of each coheir). The ages might well be approximate, particularly if given in 'round figures', and for older heirs; if the heir were a minor, however, accuracy would be important.

Further records might be made of the assignment of dower (part of a husband's estate, to be held by his widow for her lifetime). If the heir were a minor, the crown had the right to his or her wardship - the heir would not take possession of the estate until his or her majority was attained, and at this point proof of age might be recorded. From 1540, in cases where the heir was a minor (or in cases of lunacy), further information may be found in the records of the Court of Wards and Liveries (letter-code: WARD).

One shortcoming of this system, genealogically speaking, is that it applied only to tenants in chief. No such record would be taken for anyone who was, technically speaking, a sub-tenant, no matter how rich or powerful he might be. On the other hand, many other people are mentioned incidentally in the inquisitions. Those of higher status appear as sub-tenants or as trustees ('feoffees') of the deceased; feoffees were often related to the tenant, although the relationships are not usually stated. Humbler people appear as jurors, or may give evidence about the age of the heir, and detailed manorial surveys might also be made.

There are published abstracts of the inquisitions post mortem (and the associated documents), from the earliest records up to the early 15th century (in progress), and also for the reign of Henry VII (1485-1509). (These abstracts do not generally include detailed manorial surveys, but do include the names of jurors from volume 22 onwards - i.e. from 1422 onwards.) For the intervening period there are older printed calendars, which include the names of the manors held, but few genealogical details.