Genealogy and History
Some thoughts on the relationship
between genealogical methods with historical research, to uncover the full
picture
The
Encounter of Genealogy and History
There comes
a point in a genealogical journey when a family story meets the story of the
place from where the family came, and then the wider national, even global,
history. The family story itself starts to blossom by adding local and national
context to the direct history of a single family. The encounter also provides a
direct route into local and national history, which is far more enthralling to
follow than a more formal reading of history.
Genealogy is
best progressed not in isolation, but as part of a multidisciplinary world, and
encounters with historical and archaeological research is the inevitable direction
to building the depth and richness of a family narrative.
The starting
point in reaching beyond pure genealogy is a study of the history of the places
which have been identified as the home of the family. A study of local history starts
to build context and to explain.
|
|
The Making of South Yorkshire, David Hey, 1979 |
|
The Poachers of Pickering Forest 1282 to 1338, Derek
Rivard |
|
Great Ayton, A History of the Village, Dan O’Sullivan |
As the local
history unfolds, a broader understanding of the national story is very helpful.
These are some of the broader texts that I found helpful.
Robert Tombs, The English and their History A
comprehensive journey into English History |
|
A
helpful starting point for a deeper dive into pre Norman Conquest history |
|
Simon Schama, A Complete History of Britain A
thorough history in three volumes |
|
The Shaping of Modern Britain, 1790 to 1914, Eric Evans |
Whilst the
secondary sources provide the broad patterns of history, the best approach is
to constantly dive back into primary sources, to found the basis of the factual narrative and which provide
direct contemporaneous sources to help build up your story. Those primary sources
can start to venture beyond genealogical records such as BMD and census
records, to wider historical material.
Bede, Ecclesiastical History of the English People |
|
The Yorkshire Lay Subsidy, 1301 |
|
City of York Register of Freemen 1272 to 1558 |
|
|
I also find
podcasts helpful to listen to. They may not be primary sources of material of
which historians might approve, but they are helpful to conjure up ideas, and
inspire the direction of travel.
The
ultimate history series, with a database of thousands of historical episodes. |
|
Inspiration
from chat between Tom Holland and Dominic Sandbrook |
|
Some
useful topics from medieval history |
|
Some
helpful summaries of historical landmarks and their history |
The
encounter with historical and archaeological material provides richness and
depth to the genealogical narrative and the disciplines are properly entwined. Genealogy
is the study of history, and the study of history gains direct meaning from
rooting it in a search for a genealogical story. The relationship is symbiotic.
The
History of History
There is a
helpful In Our Time Podcast, the History of History
which explores how studying history, and the writing of history, has changed
over time, and another which considers History and Understanding the
Past.
There was an
intellectual divide which arose in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, from
a divergence of views between supporters of Stuart absolute monarchy and the
Puritan challengers of the time of Civil War, which has influenced the
evolution of British identity.
The first
monumental history was by Charles I’s councillor, Edward
Hyde, First Earl of Clarendon who began his History of the Rebellion
which he started in the 1640s and published in 1702. Separately there developed
a Whig history, whose pioneer was a Protestant soldier in William of
Orange’s invading army called Paul Rapin de Thoyras
who wrote Histoire d’Angleterre (1723 to 1727)
aimed at a foreign audience. It set out the Whig view of English history
as a continuous struggle through the ages to defend ancient freedoms. Charles I
had tried to enslave England, but the culmination of the national evolution came
with the Glorious Revolution.
A competing Tory
history was found in the works of the Scottish Enlightenment philosopher,
David Hume’s History of
England (1757). He argued against extremes and suggested that societies
progressed through improvements in education, government, law and economic
management. He did not recognise the idea that the Norman Yoke had subdued an antique
Anglo Saxon character that needed to be revived. Liberty did not come from
resisting the Crown, rather it required the authority, even absolute, of the
monarchy. The Tudors had laid the foundations for the best form of government.
It was Cromwell who had seized power by violence. True liberty was not in
ancient rights but in modern thinking. History should teach the people to be
grateful for what they had. Hume was accused by the Whigs of being a Jacobite.
John Wilkes’
History of England (1768) adopted Rapin’s view, that liberty is the
character of the Englishman. Catherine Macaulay attacked Hume in her History
of England (1763 to 1783) and recounted an eternal struggle for Saxon
freedom against the Norman yoke.
Edmund Burke
wrote the Whig history Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790).
He argued that fundamental rights had built up since Magna Carta in the
evolution of custom and the Common Law. England’s age of revolutions was over
and had changed from a period of political turbulence to a nation of continuity
and peace.
Thomas
Babington Macaulay continued the Whig historical tradition with his History of
England (1848 to 1855). His focus was on resistance to the Stuarts, but
he downgraded the idea of an ancient constitution inherited from the Anglo
Saxons and focused on progress through enlightened trade, libraries, factories
etc.
Thomas Carlisle
published Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches (1845), which allowed
Cromwell himself to posthumously speak to heroic struggles.
There was
nevertheless a distaste for Roundhead oppression, captured in W F
Yeames’ painting When did you last see your
father? (1878) and Frederick Marryar’s children’s
novel, The Children of the New Forest (1847).
Whig pieties
were reaffirmed by Macaulay’s great nephew, George
Macaulay Trevelyan, one of the last of the Whig Historians, in his History
of England (1926), Shortened History (1942) and English
Social History (1944).
After that,
the Cambridge historian Herbert
Butterfield, dismissed Whig history in his caricature, The
Whig Interpretation of History (1931) and it was parodied by W C Sellar
and R J Yeatman’s 1066 and all
that, portraying every episode of British history as a good thing
which progressed Britain’s progress to top nation.
Whig history
died as the focus turned in the twenty first century to what had gone wrong
with Britain. The American version perhaps outlived the British. The First
World War shook British confidence and a period of post war declinism
and European integration, and the democratisation of European nations including
Germany, led to the waning of the Whig historical perspective.